- Widespread spring flooding forecast
- Lawmakers celebrate Kansas Agriculture Day
- Task force looks at childhood obesity
- Lincoln bill makes record investments in child nutrition programs
- Whole Grain Foods Are Key to a Healthy Lifestyle
- Grange pleased with broadband initiative
- Mo. hog giant gets community backing
- NFU Delegates Set Policy Goals
- FAS Under Secretary Speaks at NFU Convention
- R-CALF Sees Positives in Competition Workshops
- HVP Tainted Products May Need New Labels
- Sugar Beet Injunction Denied
- Senators Want Japan to Take Action
- Vilsack Visiting Japan Next Month
- Senators Want Restraint on Ag Budget Cuts
- Judges Denies Injunction of Biotech Sugarbeets
- UNL Soil specialist recognized by Great Plains Soil Fertility group
The letter states, “In our opinion, the Justice Department’s action in refusing to fully investigate the antitrust implications of the unprecedented merger between JBS and Pilgrim’s Pride – the world’s largest beef packer and North America’s largest broiler processor, respectively – when these firms both control and market substitutable, competing proteins, is an irrepressible defiance of President Obama’s promise to ensure competitive markets for the nation’s farmers and ranchers, including its cattle farmers and ranchers.”
The group’s letter further states that Justice’s inaction has “decisively undercut” the financial efforts of U.S. cattle producers whom were assessed $82.8 million in 2007 to fund the beef checkoff program that is designed to enhance beef’s competitiveness with poultry and other protein substitutes. The letter points out that a producer-funded checkoff research project, which claims that beef’s nutritional content is superior to poultry, was touted by the checkoff program as one of the 20 top accomplishments during the program’s first 20 years of existence. In addition, the group’s letter cites a 2006 producer-paid checkoff advertisement that publicly claimed the checkoff program was needed because of the significant supply of inexpensive poultry products.
“When, as here, the federal government has mandated that producers contribute to a program so beef can better compete against chicken, the Justice Department has no basis to assert that beef and poultry are not competing products and no basis to claim that a merger involving these competing products won’t seriously reduce competition in direct violation of U.S. antitrust laws,” said
“JBS is now free to control the majority of U.S. broiler production while it already controls a near-dominant share of U.S. fed cattle production and, therefore, is now free to adjust at will both the supply and price of both of these competing products. This is the antithesis of competition,” the
In its correspondence to Justice,
The letter concludes with: “Please explain to us why the U.S. Department of Justice has refused to fully investigate the JBS/Pilgrim’s Pride merger, let alone block it, in the wake of President Obama’s promise to restore competition to agricultural markets through the enforcement of
© 2008 The Nebraska Rural Radio Association. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.




