Ag News Links
More Ag News
- Best of Modern Ag on Display at Farm Show
- Nebraska Soybean Board Promotes US Beef, Pork in Japan Events
- UNL Agronomy and Horticulture Department 100 years old
- Neb. Game and Parks Commission OKs reorganization
- Several animal births at Nebraska State Fair
- CCC Rates Announced for September
- Pioneer Expanding IMPACT Program
- Turning Up Heat on Corn-Based Plastics
- Poultry Research Findings Reported
- Call Issued for New Pathogen Testing Regulations
- R-CALF CEO Defends Invitation
- Change Possible After November Voting
- USDA Takes Steps to Authorize RR Sugarbeets
- House Committee Hearing on Food Safety Scheduled
- Loans Benefit Electric Consumers
- Rural Development Funds Released
- USDA Announces Next Steps on Sugar Beets
- Temple Grandin Winner Off Screen
- Covert Veal Production Footage Released
- NCBA at Odds With Partnership
- Call Made for Continued Use of Antibiotics
- Organic Price Election Programs Announced
- Vilsack Responds to ERS Reports
- ERS Predicts Higher 2010 Farm Income
- Agriculture Helps Keep Unemployment Rates Low
- Water Management Summit in Gothenburg September 23
- Recipients of Rural Business Enterprise grants announced
- Ethanol Production, Demand Set Highs
Ag News
Group suggests changes to beef checkoff
Published Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 09:57 AM

"USCA deeply appreciates the opportunity made available by the CBB to provide comments and recommendations for change to the national beef checkoff program," said Danni Beer, USCA Director and Beef Checkoff Committee Chair, Keldron, SD. "Producers across the country recognize that it’s time to update an aging program to meet the needs of our evolving industry. Producers want and need meaningful changes that will create more autonomy and independence for the beef checkoff. As we move forward with the implementation of country of origin labeling, producers want a well funded marketing program to support their branded product. The enhancements recommended by USCA will be pivotal in building stronger producer support for the checkoff and we’re hopeful that all of these changes will be considered by the CBB."
USCA’s recommendations included the following points:
• Eliminate language in the law requiring that the Operating Committee contract only with established, national non-profit industry-governed organizations, which would permit the CBB to contract directly with vendors and avoid potential conflicts of interested generated by the policy positions of any national organization. USCA recommended eliminating the provision in the law that restricts the Operating Committee from contracting with any non-profit organization established after 1986.
• Establish a periodic referendum for producers on the checkoff program, which would be in addition to the already available petition option for a producer referendum, to provide for additional accountability to producers.
• Direct that a portion of beef checkoff funds collected from U.S. cattle producers be used to promote products derived from cattle that are specifically born, raised and processed in the U.S. Allow importers to use a similar percentage of funds collected from imports to promote imported product.
• Separate the Federation of State Beef Councils from the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA), creating independence and autonomy for the checkoff program. "Two divisions of the beef checkoff governance system, the CBB and the Federation of State Beef Councils are mandated by the Beef Promotion Act," wrote USCA. "NCBA is a policy-driven organization that is the majority contractor for checkoff funds. We believe that the CBB, the Federation of State Beef Councils and NCBA should become individually independent and autonomous in order to alleviate the impression they are operating as one entity.
• Require the CBB to meet separately from NCBA and all other policy-driven or contracting organizations.
• Remove all policy representatives from Joint Checkoff Committees and require that the representation on those committees reflect the make-up of the Checkoff Operating Committee.
• Require that all funds forwarded by State Beef Councils for use by the National Beef Checkoff program be delivered to the CBB for award by the Beef Checkoff Operating Committee, in a manner similar to how national checkoff funds are expended by the CBB. State Beef Councils should be permitted to earmark such funds to certain specific programs.
• Establish policy that will disallow any checkoff contractor from assuming credit for accomplishments and efforts funded by the national mandatory checkoff program.
• Separate the Beef Checkoff web site from the web site of NCBA.
• Establish policy that will make the planning process for the Beef Checkoff more inclusive. Very few organizations have the opportunity to provide input into potential Checkoff programs and have very little access to contracting opportunities.
• USCA supports the current one dollar per head assessment. USCA will not consider support of an increase in the assessment until meaningful changes are made to improve the transparency and governance of the national mandatory checkoff program, and any increase must be approved through a referendum by producers paying the assessment.
USCA's letter to the CBB can be read in its entirety on the USCA web site at www.uscattlemen.org.
© 2010 The Nebraska Rural Radio Association. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.




